Suche

UNCITRAL Exp  
UNCITRAL Expedited Arbitration Rules (2021)

ZivilrechtZivilprozessrecht

Schiedsverfahrensrecht

  1. The appointing authority has a significant role in expediting the proceedings, especially with regard to the constitution of the arbitral tribunal. Therefore, it is important that the parties agree on the choice of an appointing authority (see model arbitration clause, paragraph (a)). When the parties have not agreed on that choice, article 6 of the Expedited Rules provides a mechanism for the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) to designate an appointing authority or to serve as one, both of which would lead to an earlier engagement of the appointing authority.
  2. Article 6(1) simplifies the process provided for in article 6(2) of the UARs by allowing a party to request the Secretary-General of the PCA to serve as the appointing authority. It provides a streamlined and flexible process, while providing a level of discretion to the Secretary-General of the PCA.
  3. The process is accelerated by allowing any party to engage with the Secretary-General of the PCA any time after 15 days have lapsed from the receipt by all parties of a proposal on an appointing authority. In practice, this means that a claimant that has included in its notice of arbitration a proposal for an appointing authority in accordance with article 4(1) is able to make the request to the Secretary-General of the PCA immediately upon the lapse of the 15-day time frame in article 5(1).
  4. It should, however, be noted that article 5(1) provides the respondent 15 days to respond to the notice of arbitration, which should also include a response to the proposal for an appointing authority. Therefore, it would be prudent for the claimant to consider such response before engaging the Secretary-General of the PCA. In any case, the Secretary-General of the PCA in exercising its functions under article 6(1) would be required to give the parties an opportunity to present their views, including any proposals on the appointing authority.
  5. Similar to article 6(1), article 6(2) modifies article 6(4) of the UARs and allows a party to request the Secretary-General of the PCA to designate a substitute appointing authority or to serve as one, where the appointing authority refuses or fails to act. However, this would not be possible when the Secretary-General of the PCA is already serving as the appointing authority.
  6. Paragraph 3 provides a level of discretion to the Secretary-General of the PCA to address practical questions that could arise, for example, (i) when a party has previously rejected or rejects a proposal for the Secretary-General of the PCA to serve as appointing authority; (ii) when a party requests the Secretary-General of the PCA to serve as appointing authority and the other party requests it to serve as designating authority; and (iii) when a party requests the Secretary-General of the PCA to either designate an appointing authority or to serve as an appointing authority.
  7. Paragraphs 1, 3, 5, 6 and 7 of article 6 of the UARs continue to apply to expedited arbitration.
Quelle: UNCITRAL
Import: